Simplicity Within Reason: Part Two

/in /by

In the first post in this series, we wrote about our notion that insurance is a business of universal requirements that are simple but subtle. As a test of that notion, we wanted to see if we could explain what a policy administration should do as briefly but completely as possible. We did it in 35 words:

Property & Casualty administration systems should manage the policy lifecycle — from underwriting, quoting, issuance, and billing to claims, renewals, endorsements, and cancellations — ensuring data integrity, regulatory compliance, and integration with other systems and data sources.

How should such a system do that? Simply put, it should:

  1. Underwrite, generate quotes accurately based on risk assessments and policy terms, calculate premiums, and provide detailed cost breakdowns.
  2. Bind and issue coverage — including policy certificates, endorsements, renewals, and other relevant documents — issue billing statements and flexible means of making payments.
  3. Generate invoices with flexible billing schedules, support multiple payment methods, and integrate with payment gateways for secure transactions.
  4. Simplify claims processing by automating intake, verifying policy details, and processing payouts to reduce time and effort and maintain customer satisfaction and trust.
  5. Ensure regulatory compliance by tracking changes to prevent noncompliance fees and penalties.
  6. Integrate CRM, financial management, or other systems and data sources to ensure insurance operations are aligned and efficient.

While some of those capabilities are less subtle than others, policy administration systems should simplify all of them for their users. If they didn’t, we’d be back to the future of paper, rate and statistical tables, actuarial charts, adding machines, slide rules, typewriters, manual processing, handwritten checks, file cabinets, snail mail, fax machines, more people, more time, less efficiency, and more room for error.

If anybody wanted that, we’d have stayed in the 1950s, content to wait weeks or months for policies to be issued. While those kinds of wait times were universal, there was nothing simple or subtle about them.

That’s why we aspired to create Aspire.